W have seen the scandalous pictures of the Play-Doh penis.
And the HEADLINES were awesome. Many parents were OUTRAGED.
Looking at the Play-Doh facebook page adds some perspective, though:
A lot of people had no problem with the toy. Many were perplexed at the heights of emotion some adults reached over the perception that the Play-Doh extruder resembled a penis, in some ways.
The question is, did this ever come up during design reviews? Or in the prototype shop? Or in the production approval process? I mean, if you look at the pictures the toy's dickishness could have been toned down a bit.
Sometimes there is no accounting for customer tastes. In the end the Play-Doh parent company Hasbro has offered to replace the toys for any scandalized adults and will change the design for future sales.
A Plant Rat works in the plant, factory, refinery, or processing facility. Somehow we learn to navigate the maze. Here we can exchange information, ideas and questions to help us improve the manufacturing process. We must reduce variation and standardize our work to produce the best quality possible.
Wednesday, December 31, 2014
Tuesday, December 30, 2014
They Cannot Read Me in China
Reports of Google's blockage in China, and partial recovery, continue.
I know Plantrat cannot currently be read.
Google's Transparency Report shows the drop off in Google traffic in China from Dec 27.
When I checked with some readers they still could not see Plantrat. Google's data does not show a significant change, although Google states it is early data and subject to change.
I know Plantrat cannot currently be read.
Google's Transparency Report shows the drop off in Google traffic in China from Dec 27.
Transparency Report 30Dec2014 |
Blogger Traffic |
Dodge Trucks, Clutch Switches, and Springs
Chrysler (now Fiat Chrysler Automobiles - FCA) has announced a recall of some 2006-2007 Dodge trucks:
Based on what is available, it seems that a new ignition interlock switch included a spring with a different steel than in previous switches. It is not clear to me if the new switch was a new design, or a new supplier's switch, or if the switch was a carry over but the spring contained the defect of having the wrong steel.
The problem does not seem to have been a production quality issue, but rather a design related failure. Here are some of the questions I would have:
These types of failures seem to fall back on the old tried and true system failures.
An investigation by FCA US engineers discovered switches in certain model-year 2006 and 2007 pickups may be equipped with spring wire that differs from wire used in previous switches. The alternate wire may break and, as a result, the vehicles may not start. In rare cases, a vehicle may – if recommended starting procedures are not followed – exhibit unintended movement when its ignition key is turned.
The recall covers certain Dodge Dakota, Dodge Ram 1500, 2500, 3500 and Mitsubishi Raider pickups. Switches with the alternate wire were not used in any vehicles produced before July of 2005, or after June of 2006. The Dakota and Raider are no longer in production. (The latter was built for Mitsubishi under terms of an assembly contract.)Reading the NHTSA investigations page, Chrysler has decided to recall certain manual transmission applications. (NHTSA Action Number: PE14013)
Chrysler's Safety Report states that: 1) the clutch ignition interlock switch return springs may experience fatigue failure due to material issues; 2) if the return springs are broken, the switch contacts may not reflect actual clutch pedal position; and 3) the failures could result in a vehicle experiencing unintended movement if the ignition is cranked when the clutch pedal is not being pressed. Chrysler's recall remedy will replace the clutch ignition interlock switch on all affected vehicles with a switch with a more robust design.
One of the MY 2006 complaints involved a fatality that occurred when a young child was able to start a MY 2006 Ram 3500 truck that was parked with the transmission in gear, without depressing the clutch. The diesel engine started and the vehicle moved forward under power running over another child resulting in fatal injuries.NHTSA's Office of Defect Investigations has more detail: (Investigation: PE 14-013)
ODI has received three vehicle owner complaints (VOQs) alleging incidents of engine crank or start when the clutch was not engaged due to clutch interlock switch failure. The complaints involved 1 model year (MY) 2004 Dodge Ram 2500 truck and 2 MY 2006 Dodge Ram 3500 trucks equipped with manual transmissions. One complaint (VOQ
10566076) involved an incident that occurred when a child was able to enter the vehicle and start the ignition without depressing the clutch. The vehicle then moved forward striking another child resulting in a fatality. A second complaint (10533996) described an incident that occurred when the engine was cranked without the clutch pedal
depressed while an individual was standing directly in front of the vehicle performing work under the hood. The clutch interlock failed to prevent the engine from cranking, which resulted in vehicle movement into the pedestrian performing work under the hood. The individual was knocked to the ground, but did not report any injuries.
Based on what is available, it seems that a new ignition interlock switch included a spring with a different steel than in previous switches. It is not clear to me if the new switch was a new design, or a new supplier's switch, or if the switch was a carry over but the spring contained the defect of having the wrong steel.
The problem does not seem to have been a production quality issue, but rather a design related failure. Here are some of the questions I would have:
- Is the new spring steel a "normal" selection? In other words, has the new steel been used before, or on an approved list? If the steel was "new" there should have been a heightened test schedule.
- Was the new switch with the new spring steel tested to confirm it meets durability targets? What was the test schedule?
- How open to Chrysler was the new switch design?
These types of failures seem to fall back on the old tried and true system failures.
Monday, December 29, 2014
The intertwining of family malfeasance into corporate Chaebol dynasties has been further revealed in ongoing investigations into the Nut Rage case. Prior posts are here (lessons learned) and here (the stink of bad management).
YonHap News reports that an internal Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) audit into their own investigation of the Nut Rage case has revealed improper conduct and has led to the reprimand of eight ministry officials. (YonHap News)
This evidence of the overbearing power of the Chaebols into Korean regulation and public safety government offices can only feed fuel to the anti-nepotism movement in Korea.
YonHap News reports that an internal Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) audit into their own investigation of the Nut Rage case has revealed improper conduct and has led to the reprimand of eight ministry officials. (YonHap News)
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport |
The transportation ministry said Monday that it will reprimand eight ministry officials involved in the recent investigation into the "nut rage" case for their unfair manner favorable to the former vice president of Korean Air Lines Co.
The ministry investigation had concluded Cho Hyun-ah, the former vice president of Korean Air, did in fact cause a scene, but that an order to turn the plane around to its boarding gate to drop off the head purser had come from the captain of the flight.
Based on such a conclusion, the ministry had filed a complaint against Cho with the prosecution on suspicions of causing a disturbance aboard a flight, which carries a maximum penalty of a fine of 5 million won (US$4,555), presumably a petty amount for the daughter of Korean Air chairman Cho Yang-ho.The prosecutor's office apparently had enough information from from its own investigation to charge Cho Hyun-ah with larger crimes:
Two accounts of aviation safety regulation violations, including coercion and interference in the execution of duty that led to a change in flight plan, crimes punishable by a prison term of up to 10 years.I am surprised at the pace of the recognition and response to the improper behavior of the MOLIT officials. Nut Rage only occurred on December 8.
This evidence of the overbearing power of the Chaebols into Korean regulation and public safety government offices can only feed fuel to the anti-nepotism movement in Korea.
Saturday, December 27, 2014
The Consequences of Russia's Crisis on Manufacturing
I was wondering what the effects of Russia's falling ruble and the drop of oil export revenue would have on the manufacturing sector.
Due to the lower value of the ruble, manufactured Russian exports would be less expensive and therefore beneficial to any importer to purchase. Demand for Russian exports should increase and mean Russian factories can run at a higher capacity. Except, of course, for the international economic sanctions that have been imposed on Russia.
The US sanctions are laid out in two Executive Orders issued in March, and an extending order to those two EOs:
Due to the lower value of the ruble, manufactured Russian exports would be less expensive and therefore beneficial to any importer to purchase. Demand for Russian exports should increase and mean Russian factories can run at a higher capacity. Except, of course, for the international economic sanctions that have been imposed on Russia.
The US sanctions are laid out in two Executive Orders issued in March, and an extending order to those two EOs:
Utilizing these Executive Orders, the United States has steadily increased the diplomatic and financial costs of Russia’s aggressive actions towards Ukraine. We have designated a number of Russian and Ukrainian entities, including 14 defense companies and individuals in Putin’s inner circle, as well as imposed targeted sanctions limiting certain financing to six of Russia’s largest banks and four energy companies. We have also suspended credit finance that encourages exports to Russia and financing for economic development projects in Russia, and are now prohibiting the provision, exportation, or reexportation of goods, services (not including financial services), or technology in support of exploration or production for deepwater, Arctic offshore, or shale projects that have the potential to produce oil in the Russian Federation, or in maritime area claimed by the Russian Federation and extending from its territory, and that involve five major Russian energy companies.This means that the sanctions affecting manufacturing are primarily targeted at military and energy producing entities.
In September the US Treasury Department detailed further specific sanctions against defense & energy related industry and banks:
Treasury today has also imposed new sanctions and strengthened existing sanctions targeting firms operating in Russia’s defense sector.Determination about Russia’s Defense and Related Material Sector and Imposition of Sanctions against Rostec. Treasury Secretary Jacob J. Lew today made a determination under E.O. 13662 that persons operating within Russia’s defense and related materiel sector may now be subject to targeted sanctions. Following Secretary Lew’s determination, Treasury issued a new directive that imposes sanctions on Rostec, a major Russian conglomerate that operates in the defense and related materiel sector. Directive 3 pursuant to E.O. 13662 prohibits transactions in, provision of financing for, and other dealings in new debt of greater than 30 days maturity issued by Rostec, and its 50 percent or more owned subsidiaries, effectively cutting it off from U.S. debt financing.
• Rostec is a Russia-based state-owned holding company for Russia’s defense industry. Rostec produces, develops, manufactures, and exports civil, military, and dual-purpose high-technology goods, and is involved in the manufacturing of weapons and military equipment. Rostec-held subsidiaries manufacture and export military products valued in the billions. Treasury designated Rostec’s Director General, Sergei Viktorovich Chemezov, on April 28, 2014, pursuant to E.O. 13661.
Designation of Additional Defense Technology Companies under E.O. 13661. Treasury has also designated and blocked the assets of five Russian defense firms under E.O. 13661 for operating in the arms and related materiel sector in the Russian Federation. The firms designated today under E.O. 13661 include OAO ‘Dolgoprudny Research Production Enterprise,’ Mytishchinski Mashinostroitelny Zavod OAO, Kalinin Machine Plant JSC, Almaz-Antey GSKB, and JSC NIIP. The designated firms are responsible for the production of a range of materiel, from small arms to mortar shells to tanks. As a result of today’s actions under E.O. 13661, any assets of these entities that are within U.S. jurisdiction must be frozen. Additionally, transactions by U.S. persons or within the United States involving these entities are generally prohibited.
• OAO ‘Dolgoprudny Research Production Enterprise’ is a Russia-based company, which is primarily engaged in the production of weapons and ammunition, including the Buk missile system, known in the West as “Gadfly” or SA-11 or SA-17.
• Mytishchinski Mashinostroitelny Zavod, OAO is a Moscow-based company that has produced weaponry and equipment focusing primarily on anti-aircraft missile systems and chassis for tracked military vehicles.
• Kalinin Machine Plant JSC is a Russia-based, state-run company involved in the production of special purpose products such as weapons, ammunition, and combat anti-air missile system facilities for the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. Kalinin Machine Plant JSC produces artillery guns for infantry and anti-air defense and specializes in the production of launchers and anti-air missiles.
• Almaz-Antey GSKB is a Moscow-based subsidiary of the Almaz-Antey Concern, which was designated under E.O. 13661 on July 16, 2014. Almaz-Antey GSKB designs and manufactures air defense systems for the Russian Ministry of Defense.
• JSC NIIP is a Zhukovski-based Russian defense industrial firm owned by the Almaz-Antey Concern. JSC NIIP develops anti-aircraft defense systems, including on-board radar systems for MiG and Sukhoi fighters, and anti-aircraft missile systems for land forces, including the KUB and BUK systems.
The US and EU sanctions seem to be fairly well coordinated and close in substance. The EU sanctions reported in September are contained in a far more legalese laden document than the US's EOs, but the BBC reports:
The EU sanctions announced on 12 September targeted Russia's state finances, energy and arms sectors. These are sectors managed by the powerful elite around President Vladimir Putin.
Russia has invoked their own sanctions in response to the EU and US sanctions.
In August the BBC reported, "Russia is imposing a "full embargo" on food imports from the EU, US and some other Western countries, in response to sanctions over Ukraine."
In December, in response to the plummeting ruble, Russia began to restrict grain exports. (Bloomburg), "Futures jumped to the highest since May last week after an exporters’ association said Russia denied certificates that grain sellers and buyers need. The government will draw up proposals for export duties on grains in the next 24 hours, Deputy Prime Minister Arkady Dvorkovich said today. "
Recognizing the complexity of the interlinking economic and commodity pieces of the puzzle, what effect could all of this have on manufacturers?
The Observatory of Economic Complexity is an MIT Media Lab website focused on distributing international trade data in a visual form. The information for Russia shows that the top export items from Russia are:
The top 20 export items contained no manufactured items that were not a commodity or material. All of the oil based exports are sanctioned and now Russia is self-restricting some grain and food exports with tariffs designed to try and keep those items within Russia and the price stable for their own citizens. The tariffs are generally seen as a overall negative impact to the health of the Russian economy. Vox has a good summation:
The Russian government's inclination to reduce grain exports does tell us something pretty clear about the Russian economy. The desire to shelter ordinary Russians from higher food prices is completely understandable. But a cheaper currency leading to more robust exports is one of the major channels through which a country is supposed to bounce back from an adverse shock in the global economy.There does not seem to be a strong Russian manufacturing export industry that can benefit from the cheaper ruble and aid in Russia's economic recovery. Is there any Russian company that can benefit from this crisis?
If the dollar value of Russian oil exports is going to fall, then Russia desperately needs exports of something else to come in and fill the gap. If that "something else" isn't going to be grain, then what's it going to be? The world is not exactly clamoring to get its hands on Russian manufactured goods or to sign up for VKontakte accounts. Curbing wheat exports is a fine idea if the oil price decline is just a passing storm that ends in the near future. But if oil goes into a multi-year period of relative abundance, these kind of measures will only make it harder for the Russian economy to adjust.
Friday, December 26, 2014
Patrick Stewart is having FUN
Everyone loves Patrick Stewart. Since his stint as Jean-Luk Pickard he is an iconic figure.
I first noticed Patrick was having fun, personal goofy fun, when I saw this video in August 2013:
"Shh.Hush.You are here to learn, not to talk."
He is schooling his fiance, Sunny Ozell, on double takes and demonstrates the single, double, triple, and the exceedingly difficult quadruple take. Notice Sunny's feet on Patrick's shins. And, Patrick has apparently had a few nips of something strong. I imagine it is a fine whiskey. The pair seem to be having a great time.
Today I say another video by Sunny. Patrick grudgingly agrees to wear a magic elf hat and he cannot help but react. Good on him and Sunny.
By the way, Sunny Ozell is the singer Madameozell. Patrick and Sunny have been engaged, reportedly, since March 2013.
I first noticed Patrick was having fun, personal goofy fun, when I saw this video in August 2013:
"Shh.Hush.You are here to learn, not to talk."
He is schooling his fiance, Sunny Ozell, on double takes and demonstrates the single, double, triple, and the exceedingly difficult quadruple take. Notice Sunny's feet on Patrick's shins. And, Patrick has apparently had a few nips of something strong. I imagine it is a fine whiskey. The pair seem to be having a great time.
Today I say another video by Sunny. Patrick grudgingly agrees to wear a magic elf hat and he cannot help but react. Good on him and Sunny.
Ford Mustang 2015 - Wins Detroit Free Press Car Award
On December 25th the Detroit Free Press announced that their award for Car of the Year goes to the new 2015 Ford Mustang. Says Mark Phelan: "The 2015 Ford Mustang also gets my vote for North American Car of the Year. The winner of that award will be announced Jan. 12 at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit."
The Mustang is produced at the Ford Flat (Michigan) Rock Assembly Plant. From Ford Media:
Those of you who travel I-75 can see the plant to the west of the highway. You may remember the plant used to be a Mazda plant and then was called Auto Alliance.
New from the ground up, the 2015 Mustang combines the pony car's ageless appeal with the latest technology and contemporary design. The result is the first Mustang consciously created to be sold around the world, a turbocharged global ambassador of American design, manufacturing and technology.
ford.com |
The Mustang is produced at the Ford Flat (Michigan) Rock Assembly Plant. From Ford Media:
- In 2013, nine years after moving Mustang production there, Flat Rock Assembly Plant celebrated the 1 millionth Mustang built at the facility.
- In the last year, the plant has been transformed. As part of a $555 million investment, it has added a state-of-the-art, fully flexible body shop to allow multiple models to be produced on the same line, supporting Ford’s flexible manufacturing efforts. Other technologies recently incorporated at Flat Rock include three-wet paint process, dirt detection and laser brazing.
- In addition to Mustang, Flat Rock Assembly Plant also produces Ford Fusion. The facility has approximately 3,000 employees working two shifts at full line speed.
- Flat Rock Assembly Plant has been producing vehicles since 1987, when it opened as Mazda Motor Manufacturing USA and built Mazda MX-6. Ford purchased a 50 percent share in the facility in 1992, and it was renamed AutoAlliance International. Over the years, the plant has produced Mazda 626, Mazda6, Mercury Cougar and Ford Probe.
- For the first time in its 50-year history, Mustang will be available globally to customers in more than 120 countries around the world.
- The addition of a right-hand-drive Mustang to Ford’s global vehicle lineup will allow the iconic pony car to be exported to more than 25 right-hand-drive markets around the world, including the United Kingdom, Australia and South Africa.
Those of you who travel I-75 can see the plant to the west of the highway. You may remember the plant used to be a Mazda plant and then was called Auto Alliance.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)