Friday, November 21, 2008

Exagerated Wage Claims

Have you heard how Detroit wages are about $70 an hour including benefits? Does this seem possible? An article in The New Republic, by Jonathan Cohn, tries to set the story straight.

Let's start with the fact that it's not $70 per hour in wages. According to Kristin Dziczek of the Center for Automotive Research--who was my primary source for the figures you are about to read--average wages for workers at Chrysler, Ford, and General Motors were just $28 per hour as of 2007. That works out to a little less than $60,000 a year in gross income--hardly outrageous, particularly when you consider the physical demands of automobile assembly work and the skills most workers must acquire over the course of their careers.
More important, and contrary to what you may have heard, the wages aren't that much bigger than what Honda, Toyota, and other foreign manufacturers pay employees in their U.S. factories. While we can't be sure precisely how much those workers make, because the companies don't make the information public, the best estimates suggests the corresponding 2007 figure for these "transplants"--as the foreign-owned factories are known--was somewhere between $20 and $26 per hour, and most likely around $24 or $25. That would put average worker's annual salary at $52,000 a year.

OK, so where does the $70 an hour come from?
Analysts came up with it by including the cost of all employer-provided benefits--namely, health insurance and pensions--and then dividing by the number of workers. The result, they found, was that benefits for Big Three cost about $42 per hour, per employee. Add that to the wages--again, $28 per hour--and you get the $70 figure. Voila.

That matches what I have heard about the massive legacy costs that the big three support, all of the retirees' health care costs and pensions. The transplants do not have this burden because they are newer and do not have many retirees, plus the corporations overseas have massive government support for the health care and retirement of those workers.

No comments: